MAY 08, 2025
When Free Speech Meets Deportation: The Right to Free Speech of Non-Citizens in the United States
The Trump administration has launched an unprecedented campaign targeting international students and faculty who have voiced support for Palestinian causes, with at least eight documented arrests and over 300 visa revocations across major universities. The crackdown began with the detention of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate and green card holder, who was arrested without warning at his university-owned apartment. Since then, the pattern has escalated to include cases like Rumeysa Ozturk, a doctoral student at Tufts University, who was pulled off the street by masked plainclothes agents while walking home from dinner, and Alireza Doroudi, a University of Alabama doctoral student, who was detained at his off-campus residence without explanation. These arrests have sparked widespread protests and legal challenges, with civil rights attorneys arguing that the detentions represent an unconstitutional attempt to silence political dissent through immigration enforcement.
A critical question has emerged at the intersection of immigration enforcement and constitutional rights: Can individuals face deportation for exercising their fundamental right to protest and speak freely? This question strikes at the heart of American democratic values, particularly as immigration enforcement actions have increasingly targeted vocal advocates and protesters within immigrant communities.
The stakes couldn’t be higher for both U.S. citizens and non-citizens who engage in political speech and protest. While U.S. citizens may take their First Amendment protections for granted, immigrants often face a complex legal landscape where exercising these fundamental rights could potentially trigger immigration consequences. This tension has created a chilling effect on political expression within immigrant communities, raising serious concerns about the preservation of democratic discourse and the universal nature of constitutional rights.
The intersection of First Amendment rights and immigration enforcement has a rich legal history in American jurisprudence with history and case precedent leaning towards the protection of the free speech rights of non-U.S. citizens. In 1945, the Supreme Court addressed this crucial issue in the landmark case Bridges v. Wixon, 326 U.S. 135 (1945) establishing that freedom of speech extends to non-citizens residing in the United States. The Court’s decision was particularly significant as it reversed a deportation order that was based on alleged Communist Party affiliation, emphasizing that deportation cannot be justified on “slight or insubstantial reasons.” This ruling set a crucial precedent protecting immigrants’ rights to express their political beliefs without fear of deportation. It requires the government to prove a “working alliance” with prohibited organizations rather than mere sympathy or casual support, creating a robust shield against deportation actions targeting protected speech.
The constitutional framework for protecting non-citizens’ rights was further strengthened in 1982 through Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982) where the Supreme Court definitively established that undocumented immigrants are “persons” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. While this case focused on education rights, its broader implications reinforced the principle that constitutional protections extend to all persons within U.S. jurisdiction, regardless of immigration status. This interpretation has been vital in supporting First Amendment protections for non-citizens engaging in political speech and protest activities.
The constitutional protections for non-citizens were further reinforced through Zadvydas v. Davis, U.S. 678 (2001) which confirmed that the Due Process Clause applies to all persons within U.S. jurisdiction, regardless of their immigration status. This principle, combined with the First Amendment’s protections, means that engaging in peaceful protest or political speech cannot serve as the sole basis for deportation. While Congress maintains broad authority over immigration matters, the Supreme Court has consistently held that this power remains subject to constitutional limitations, particularly when fundamental rights like freedom of expression are at stake.
The legal distinction between protected speech and deportable conduct is particularly important in the context of peaceful protest. Courts have consistently recognized that the right to peaceful assembly and protest represents core First Amendment activity that cannot be criminalized or used as grounds for removal, even for non-citizens. This protection extends to various forms of political expression, including criticism of government policies, participation in peaceful demonstrations, and advocacy for social change.
Taking Action to Protect First Amendment Rights for All
Here are concrete steps you can take to help protect First Amendment rights in the immigration context:
- Document and Report: If you witness or experience targeting of individuals for deportation based on protected speech or protest activities, document the incidents and report them to civil rights organizations specializing in immigration law. Detailed documentation strengthens legal challenges and helps establish patterns of constitutional violations.
- Support Legal Defense Funds: Contribute to or volunteer with organizations providing legal representation to immigrants facing deportation proceedings, particularly in cases involving First Amendment issues. Check out the following organizations:
- Engage with Local Government: Contact your congressional representatives to advocate for clearer guidelines protecting First Amendment activities in immigration enforcement. Push for oversight hearings on deportation practices that may chill protected speech and assembly rights.
- Build Coalition Networks: Connect with local immigration advocacy groups, civil rights organizations, and legal aid societies. Strong networks can provide rapid response support when rights violations occur and help coordinate legal and community resources.
- Educate Your Community: Share information about constitutional protections for non-citizens, particularly regarding First Amendment rights. Help dispel misconceptions about the scope of constitutional protections and ensure both citizens and non-citizens understand their rights to engage in protected speech and peaceful protest.
The protection of First Amendment rights for all persons within U.S. jurisdiction remains a cornerstone of our constitutional democracy. As we continue to navigate the complex intersection of immigration enforcement and fundamental rights, it’s crucial to remember that the Constitution’s protections extend beyond citizenship status. The Supreme Court has consistently affirmed these principles, providing a strong foundation for defending the rights of both citizens and non-citizens to engage in protected speech and peaceful protest without fear of deportation.
Please subscribe to this blog to receive email alerts when new posts go up.