The New York City Comptroller’s Employer Violations Dashboard, launched in 2024, provides unprecedented transparency into workplace violations, tracking data from federal, state, and city enforcement agencies. This comprehensive tool reveals which types of disputes occur most frequently and helps identify systemic issues across industries.
The Top Employee Disputes
- Wage and Hour Violations: The Most Pervasive Problem
Wage and hour disputes dominate New York City workplace conflicts, affecting thousands of workers annually. These violations range from basic minimum wage theft to complex overtime calculation errors.
The Scale of the Problem
The Comptroller’s data reveals staggering wage theft amounts: American Business Institute owed over $14.3 million to 175 workers, while Fadmo Home Health Care Services owed over $1.45 million to just 22 workers. These aren’t isolated incidents—they represent systematic wage theft affecting New York City’s most vulnerable workers.
Legal Framework
Wage and hour disputes in New York are governed by both federal and state law. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) sets federal minimum wage and overtime standards, while New York Labor Law often provides stronger protections. Under New York law, most employees must receive overtime pay at one and one-half times their regular rate for hours worked over 40 in a workweek.
Common Violations Include:
- Failure to pay minimum wage
- Unpaid overtime compensation
- Illegal deductions from wages
- Failure to pay final wages upon termination
- Misclassification of employees as independent contractors
Employees can file complaints with the New York State Department of Labor or pursue private lawsuits. Class action lawsuits are particularly common in wage and hour cases, allowing multiple employees to address similar violations collectively.
- Workplace Safety Violations: Life and Death Stakes
Construction and industrial workplaces in New York City face persistent safety challenges, with some violations proving fatal. The Dashboard reveals employers like Zito Roofing Inc. receiving willful OSHA violations for failing to provide basic fall protection.
Understanding OSHA Classifications
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) categorizes violations by severity. “Willful” violations—like those committed by Zito Roofing—represent the most serious category, indicating either intentional disregard or plain indifference to employee safety. These violations can result in criminal charges and substantial financial penalties.
Worker Rights and Remedies
Most workplace injuries are handled through New York’s Workers’ Compensation system, which provides benefits without requiring proof of employer negligence. However, workers may pursue additional legal action when employers commit intentional acts or gross negligence. Third-party liability claims are also possible when someone other than the employer causes the injury.
- Unfair Labor Practices: Suppressing Worker Rights
The right to organize remains under attack in New York City workplaces, with Amazon leading the pack at 180 alleged unfair labor practice violations. These disputes typically involve employer interference with unionization efforts, retaliation against union supporters, or bad faith bargaining.
Legal Protections
The National Labor Relations Act protects private sector employees’ rights to organize, join unions, and engage in collective bargaining. Employers cannot threaten, interrogate, promise benefits, or spy on workers regarding union activities.
Common Unfair Labor Practice Violations:
- Threatening employees for union activity
- Interrogating workers about union sympathies
- Promising benefits to discourage unionization
- Surveillance of union meetings or activities
- Retaliating against union supporters
- Refusing to bargain in good faith
Workers can file charges with the National Labor Relations Board, which investigates and prosecutes violations. Remedies may include reinstatement, back pay, and orders requiring employers to cease illegal conduct.
- Discrimination and Harassment: Persistent Workplace Problems
Workplace discrimination remains widespread across New York City industries. Four Seasons Licensed Home Health Care Agency’s $400,000 EEOC settlement for race-based discrimination exemplifies the ongoing struggle against workplace bias.
Protected Categories
New York provides broader protections than federal law. While Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, the New York State Human Rights Law extends protections to sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, and other categories.
Proving Discrimination Cases
Courts apply the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework in discrimination cases. Employees must first establish a prima facie case showing they belong to a protected class, suffered an adverse employment action, and that the action was linked to their protected status. If successful, employers must provide legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for their actions, which employees can then challenge as pretextual.
Harassment Standards
Harassment claims require showing unwelcome conduct based on protected characteristics that is severe enough to affect the work environment. The Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. Forklift Systems established that harassment must be evaluated both subjectively (how it affected the individual) and objectively (whether a reasonable person would find it offensive).
- Retaliation: The Most Common Form of Workplace Retaliation
Retaliation occurs when employers take adverse action against employees for engaging in legally protected activities, such as filing discrimination complaints or reporting safety violations. Alpha Wave Global’s $85,000 settlement for retaliatory firing demonstrates how seriously regulators take these violations.
Broad Protection Scope
The Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White expanded retaliation protections to include any action that might deter a reasonable worker from reporting misconduct. This means retaliation isn’t limited to termination—it can include schedule changes, job reassignments, or other adverse actions.
Evidence and Documentation
Successful retaliation claims typically require establishing a causal connection between protected activity and adverse action. Evidence such as emails, witness statements, and timing between protected activity and employer action becomes crucial in proving retaliation.
- Wrongful Termination: When At-Will Goes Too Far
New York’s at-will employment doctrine allows employers to terminate workers for most reasons, but significant exceptions exist. Employees cannot be fired for discriminatory reasons, retaliation, or refusing to engage in illegal activities.
Public Policy Exceptions
Even in at-will states, courts recognize public policy exceptions to termination. Classic examples include firing employees for filing workers’ compensation claims, reporting safety violations, or serving jury duty. These exceptions protect employees when their termination would undermine important societal interests.
Contractual Protections
Employment contracts can limit at-will termination rights. In Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc., courts found that an employee handbook created binding contractual obligations regarding employment terms. This underscores the importance of carefully reviewing all employment documents.
Legal Remedies and Practical Steps
For Employees
Document Everything: Maintain detailed records of violations, including dates, witnesses, and communications. This documentation becomes crucial evidence in legal proceedings.
Know Your Rights: Understanding legal protections helps employees recognize violations and take appropriate action. Resources like the New York City Comptroller’s Dashboard provide valuable information about employer violation patterns.
Seek Legal Counsel: Employment law attorneys can assess claims and navigate complex legal requirements. Many employment cases involve strict deadlines and procedural requirements that require professional guidance.
File Complaints: Various agencies handle different types of violations:
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for discrimination and harassment
- Department of Labor for wage and hour issues
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for safety violations
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) for unfair labor practices
For Employers
Proactive Compliance: Regular audits of employment practices can identify potential violations before they become legal problems. This includes reviewing wage calculations, safety procedures, and discrimination policies.
Employee Training: Comprehensive training on workplace rights and company policies helps prevent violations and demonstrates good faith compliance efforts.
Documentation Policies: Maintaining proper employment records protects both employers and employees. This includes time records, safety training documentation, and performance evaluations.
Legal Updates: Employment laws change frequently. Regular consultation with employment counsel helps ensure ongoing compliance with new requirements.
The Cost of Non-Compliance
The financial impact of workplace violations extends far beyond initial penalties. Uber’s $290 million settlement for wage violations and Gucci’s $330,000 sexual harassment settlement demonstrate how non-compliance costs escalate. These cases also involve reputational damage, regulatory scrutiny, and ongoing monitoring requirements.
Looking Forward: Prevention and Reform
New York City’s transparency initiatives like the Employer Violations Dashboard represent important steps toward accountability. By making violation data publicly available, these tools help workers make informed employment decisions while pressuring employers to improve compliance.
The data also reveals systemic issues requiring legislative and regulatory attention. When multiple employers in the same industry commit similar violations, targeted reforms may be necessary to address root causes rather than individual cases.
Conclusion
The stakes are too high to ignore these issues. Workers lose wages, suffer injuries, and face discrimination that affects their livelihoods and dignity. Employers face financial penalties, legal costs, and reputational damage that can threaten business viability.
By recognizing common dispute patterns and implementing effective prevention strategies, New York City workplaces can move toward the fair and safe working conditions that all employees deserve.
If you believe you have been subjected to workplace violations or need guidance on employment compliance issues, contact our office for a consultation. We provide comprehensive legal representation for both employees and employers navigating New York City’s complex employment law landscape.
Please subscribe to this blog to receive email alerts when new posts go up.